I had the day off yesterday, and since I couldn't think of anything to blog about, I spend most of my time trying to update the records in my genealogy software (Family Tree Maker). I've been very undisciplined about these updates - in fact I don't really use it very often...but that's another story.
I noticed something as I was going through all of the information I've acquired over the last five or six years. With a couple of exceptions, I've sadly neglected most of the maternal lines of my ancestors. When I have looked at the women, it was usually only for one generation then I'd go back to the male side. For example, I've done a fair amount of research on one of my maternal great-grandmothers - Jennie Cone. I've spent a lot of time looking at Jennie because I have photos of her with my mother (when she was a child) and wanted to learn more about her family. After finding Jennie's parents, I ended up focusing on her paternal line (the Cone family). I have scores of surnames where you can follow them back hundreds of years, but all I have is the name of the wife for most of these men and little else. Half of the genetic make-up that eventually turned into me came from these spouses, but I've made little effort to learn about them. I have had my mtDNA tested, but it's really meaningless because I know so little about most of the women involved - in fact, I really don't know some of the surnames involved that WOULD make this DNA test meaningful.
I'm sure more disciplined genealogists out there cover everyone, but I haven't and I'm not sure why. It could be I'm lazy because it's easier to track a single surname then one that changes with every marriage. Maybe there's also a little sexism involved because I identify more with the paternal than the maternal sides of my family tree - my guess is it's probably a little of both. At least in my family, during the 19th and early 20th centuries, the women have held everything together. There are repeated instances where fathers have died young, or ran off looking for their fortunes (never returning), and the mothers had to raise and support large families. I'm sure there are some great and heroic stories I've missed because I'm always focused on the paternal side. Has anyone else experienced what I've described?
I'm making a second addendum to my new years resolutions for genealogy: I will focus time on the women in my family tree that I know nothing about.
Click here to subscribe to Genealogy Reviews Online
Recent Comments